?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Meme alert - Peter Sheil [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Peter Sheil

[ website | Peter's Home Page ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Meme alert [Jul. 3rd, 2004|10:43 pm]
Peter Sheil
I'm an Evil Genius ... although I am almost a Hippie!

Wackiness: 18/100
Rationality: 26/100
Constructiveness: 46/100
Leadership: 36/100

You are an SEDF--Sober Emotional Destructive Follower.
This makes you an evil genius. You are extremely focused and difficult to distract from your tasks. With luck, you have learned to channel your energies into improving your intellect, rather than destroying the weak and unsuspecting.

Your friends may find you remote and a hard nut to crack. Few of your peers know you very well--even those you have known a long time--because you have expert control of the face you put forth to the world. You prefer to observe, calculate, discern and decide. Your decisions are final, and your desire to be right is impenetrable.

You are not to be messed with. You may explode.


But if the constructive number had been 5 higher then I would be an SECF--Sober Emotional Constructive Follower.
This makes you a hippie. You are passionate about your causes and steadfast in your commitments. Once you've made up your mind, no one can convince you otherwise. Your politics are left-leaning, and your lifestyle choices decidedly temperate and chaste.

You do tremendous work when focused, but usually you operate somewhat distracted. You blow hot and cold, and while you normally endeavor on the side of goodness and truth, you have a massive mean streak which is not to be taken lightly. You don't get mad, you get even.

Please don't get even with this web site.

I would point you to the web site of this test but I think everyone else has already done it :)

Peace
peter
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: spodlife
2004-07-04 03:53 am (UTC)
No evil geniuses for me. My main result was Politician, and the other three results near by were all leaders too.

As I discovered at university I was happy as leader when I understood the task at hand and was able to lead from the front. In another situation I was given the title of "leader" but I didn't fully understand the task which resulted in me hovering around, being a bit distant, watching and only rarely partisipating.
(Reply) (Thread)